![]() |
OpenClipartVectors. "persons symbol talk." 9/26/15 via pixabay. CCO Public Domain |
Reflection:
I think that my post was very well developed, because it covered a lot of the same material as my peers. In all of the posts that I browsed, each topic (Author/Audience/Contex) was fully discussed and explored at every facet. The time I spent composing the table for my sources was time well spent, in my opinion. By viewing Addie and Tyler's posts, I discovered that the rhetorical situation of texts varies not only due to topic/discipline, but also because of the intentions and biases of the writer. Each piece had a purpose, and the writers had different ways of accomplishing that purpose.
I think the Natalie Portman article is your best bet for the research project Not only did it have a good length and an opinionated view, you had a lot more information about it in your comparison. This topic is also extremely evocative, considering how popular so many of the referenced movies are. The article definitely makes a statement, and it will be an amazing subject of a research project.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the article regarding Natalie Portman is a solid rhetorical situation, as it takes a solid stance on the subject and is a good source to work from. It would also be relevant to many readers, coming across as a more generally understandable subject. In my opinion the least effective source is the source on reading plays, although it has a solid message it is less effective for this type of project.
ReplyDelete